See, a flat world is something thats natural in everyday life, it is not even recognized. If we really discover this "un-known frontier" TPTB doesn't want to recognize a "creator." We can only go by the facts and they don't always add up, do they ? Of course it matters and you proposed some good questions too. So my topic is simply, who cares if earth is round, flat, etc? This gives no benefit if earth flat, round, or hollow - it could only be 100% accurate to say the earth SEEMS flat, but it could be either flat, round, hollow, oval, or etc. I think you will eventually quit coming to this site as everyone does, and stop wondering about shape of place we all live. So then at a point it becomes futile to think about this. Why isn't there more mention of these 3 figures when making arguments for or against any of these theories? None of us have the knowledge to really know, and all of us are subject to the same information in the same libraries, video compilations, web sites, etc. * Or better model? maybe all or some of the above could be wrong partially or completely. * Round earth (center of unvierse) Tycho Brahe We've all read the same books, compilation videos, websites, etc, so aren't we all subject to the same teaching or brainwashing, thus there should be more of a basis of understanding of each others views?ģ main theories for earth in western european history/literature: We know these ideas are based on theories presented at some point. Who cares if earth is round, flat, or hollow?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |